The website was promoted on the web, was on the first page for "Daytona real estate" Daytona Beach real estate" and had 100's of first page listings in the search engines.

According to the agreement made between us with Janet Fetterman in November 2006, formally recorded February 2007. Funcoastlife was to receive 20% of commissions for all sales that came from leads from the sites Strongcastle Inc created and/or maintained.

To date, May 10, 2009, Janet Fetterman has not reported a single sale from these websites.

This in spite of the fact that in 2006 Ms. Fetterman was lucky to have 3 listings in 2006.

She now, in her own words has 16 or 17 sales per month, over a 100 listings, and in the year of 2008 had over 16 million in sales.

The websites Strongcastle Inc implemented brought over 3000 unique visitors per month to the sites marketing for Janet Fetterman, and over 80,000 unique visitors in 2 years.

In spite of the greatly increased sales, beginning at the time of Strongcastle Inc’s marketingMs. Fetterman has failed to account for a single sale resulting from the websites.

We believe their have been many.

Until August of 2008 we believed Ms. Fetterman was struggling in the real estate business just like most realtors. In a visit in August 2008, when questioned about poor sales, she “accidentally revealed” that on the contrary she was doing great, registering 16, 17 sales per month.

The obvious question which we did not ask at that time, was where was our share?

We do not know what went through Ms. Fetterman’s mind, perhaps she regretted the slip of tongue revealing her current income. We do know that from that date forward we have been harassed and vilified by both Ms. Fetterman and her partner Eugene Monkevitch.

Whereas we had an agreement on friendly terms with Mr. Monkevitch as to the building, payment and completion of this websites as late as mid August, suddenly August 29 2008 he was threatening chargeback. He again threatened chargeback in September 2008.

When we responded that we had provided exactly what he ordered and had agreed to, and that we could not complete his site so long as he continued to threaten he was not going to pay us and furthermore might initiate a chargeback, he stopped complaining.

In October Janet Fetterman began complaining to everyone she knew, including many friends and acquaintances that we had in common, that Strongcastle Inc was ripping her off by mixing their bank accounts with hers.

This entirely fallacious complaint was supposedly precipitated by the fact Strongcastle Inc was in dispute for five or six hundred dollars with their merchant processor in an entirely separate manner, and therefore in Janet Fetterman’s narration, the processor that we shared was charging her, in her merchant account.

That this was entirely fallacious was easily demonstrated. We were disputing with the merchant processor over five or six hundred dollars, all of Ms. Fettermans chargebacks and NSF charges were in the order of $6.95, $10 or $20, with subsequent NSF fees for failing to maintain adequate funds in the Funcoastlife account to cover charges costing roughly $37 in merchant account processing fees per month.

Ms. Fetterman accused us and told everyone that we were stealing from her, and to us that our difficulties were contaminating hers. When we clarified to her in writing in November 2008 that our accounts were in no way mixed with hers we thought the matter was over with.

We were wrong.

In February Ms. Fetterman began the unfounded complaints all over again.

At this point Mr. Monkevitch began his attack too.

What was interesting about all Mr. Monkevitch’s attacks, as well as Ms. Fetterman’s attacks was that we could not meet their demands even if we wanted to.

This was one of the prime indicators that their attacks were not about what they claimed, but about something else, namely not paying the money they owed.

Ms. Fetterman demanded that we repair and fix bank NSF fees that she herself had incurred.

Ms. Fetterman had her assistant destroy the rankings of her own websites in Janurary February 2009, and demanded that Strongcastle Inc fix these damages for free.

Ms. Fetterman publicly accused us of having her credit line reduced to $50,000 from $70,000, when the very bank she was accruing hundreds of dollars in chargebacks in an effort to blame us, was the bank she also had her line of credit with.

Ms. Fetterman offered in writing to pay us the 14% in commission we were owed to date for Funcoastlife sales, for future sales only, if we would fix and return the rankings of the websites she herself had her assistant destroy.

Ms. Fetterman deleted her own domain March--- less than 36 hours later, without giving us a chance to properly consider her offer. We do not know why Ms. Fetterman deleted her domain but suspect she realized that for the first time she had acknowledged in writing just what she owed. It appeared to us that rather than acknowledge or pay what she owed Ms. Fetterman was determined to destroy the evidence.

At this point we became ill, an illness that lasted two whole months, largely precipitated by delayed realization of Ms Fetterman’s treachery.

Meanwhile in spite of being informed of our illness Mr. Monkevitch instigated and continued his relentless barrage of attacks, which also could not be acted upon even if we had wanted to.

Mt. Monkevictch demanded we update within one hour domains for him that we had no interaction with or control of.

Mr. Monkevitch repeatedly threatened that if we did not do what he wanted he would chargeback the money he had already paid for the websites he had already had for a year.

Mr. Monkevitch sent several emails demanding we make changes to the websites we did manage as well as several we did not manage without ever specifying what the changes he wanted were.

Mr. Monkevitch sent several more emails berating us for not making the changes we could not make because we did not know what they were.

Mr. Monkevitch then demanded that we give him access to our server so he could make the changes himself.

We do not give clients access to our server. However, in this case, we were also very concerned that Mr. Monkevitch intended to delete the websites we had built, in order to destroy the evidence that we had ever done anything, as his partner Janet Fetterman had already done.

Mr. Monkevitch and Janet Fetterman sent a joint email in late March demanding that we change passwords to the server to words he provided within 24 hours or he was going to have us thrown in jail for internet fraud etc.

In early April Mr. Monkevitch began chargebacks. At that time we put a notice on his website that it was suspended for lack of payment.

Mr. Monkevitch moved the website back to his registrar godaddy.

Meanwhile Janet Fetterman began threatening us with eviction as we were staying in one of her houses that she could not rent.

The house had been offered in January 2009 in lieu of the money that was owed and never specifically stated as an amount, but which she had been declaring and promising we would in fact receive one day, once she could implement tracking.

In August of 2008 Ms. Fetterman had made this promise for September 2008, again in November 2008, then December 2008. Previously it had been made March 2008, July 2008, December 2007, summer 2007 and in the very beginning November 2006 through April, May June 2007. Throughout all this time Ms. Fetterman promised we would receive our promised commission when she actually had a sale.

We had no idea until August 2008 how many sales she was having.

Currently Ms. Fetterman is trying to have us evicted as tenants, which are not.

We are not tenants but we will gladly leave once we are paid what we are owed.

Concord Real Estates Borderline Activities.

1) Concord Real Estate specializes in REO properties or what is commonly called foreclosures.

What most people fail to consider is that in Florida any property that does not have air conditioning begins to get contaminated in 4-5 days with mildew and mold. Anyone who has been without power in Florida after a hurricane begins to smell the mold or mildew within days, as well as discovers the doors have swollen and are difficult to close.

Most foreclosure or REO homes in Florida have been left without power for far longer that 4 or 5 days.

It is required by Federal law that the bank, homesellers and realtors disclose all damage of which they are aware.

The official position of Concord Real Estate, as explained to us by Ms. Fetterman, is this statement: The home is sold as is. “As far as I know” there is no mold, or other damages. The implication is, she and Concord Real Estate are just the realtors or broker and how would they know.

Concord Real Estate and the realtors working for Concord Real Estate would know because in many if not most cases members of Concord Real Estate did the interior BPO house inspection.

This BPO house inspection is a very thorough multi-page inspection that usually reveals most of the homes’ faults, the very same faults Concord Real estate claims not to be aware of.

This BPO home inspection, whether carried out by Concord Real Estate or another realtor is also given to the Bank or mortgage holder or management holder of the property. Therefore there is no one in the chain of sale that does not know most if not all the faults of the home, which by convention they dismiss with “As Far as they know”

This is a class action suit waiting to happen which if aggravated enough we may pursue.

2) When an REO home is sold by Concord Real Estate, they charge the buyer an additional $300-$500 processing fee. It started at $300 but last we saw May 10 had grown to $500. They charge this processing fee in spite of receiving commission for the sale.

3) Palm Coast Real Estate vigorously tries to persuade you to let them be your buyer’s agent. In order to get buyers to commit to this Concord Real Estate promises the buyer daily updates of all the listings, (which can be acquired with no commitment from most realtors).

In return for the daily listings Concord Real Estate requires the buyer to sign a contract that they will pay Concord Real Estate a commission for any house they buy within the next year. This means that Concord Real Estate will receive a commission for any house the potential buyer buys, even if Concord Real Estate does nothing.

Caveat Emptor. Buyer beware. Deal with Concord Real Estate at your own risk.